Every year, thousands of seniors end up in the hospital not because of a fall or a heart attack, but because of a medication they were prescribed. It’s not always a mistake - sometimes, it’s just that the drug was never meant for someone their age. That’s where the Beers Criteria comes in. Developed by the American Geriatrics Society and updated every three years, it’s the most trusted guide in the U.S. for spotting medications that do more harm than good in adults 65 and older. This isn’t just a list of bad drugs - it’s a practical tool used by doctors, pharmacists, and care teams to keep older adults safe.
The Beers Criteria isn’t a suggestion. It’s a living, evidence-based standard. First created in 1991 by Dr. Mark Beers, it was adopted by the American Geriatrics Society in 2011 and has been refined with new research ever since. The latest version, released in May 2023, is based on over 7,300 high-quality studies - a 22% increase from the previous update. It’s now used in nearly 9 out of 10 U.S. healthcare systems, especially in Medicare Part D programs, where it’s required for patients taking eight or more medications.
It’s not about banning drugs. It’s about recognizing when the risks outweigh the benefits. For example, a drug that works fine for a 40-year-old might cause confusion, falls, or kidney damage in a 75-year-old. The Beers Criteria flags these situations so providers can step in before harm happens.
The 2023 Beers Criteria breaks down risky medications into five clear groups. Each one helps clinicians make smarter choices.
The 2023 update added 32 new medications to the list and removed 18 that were no longer considered risky. That’s how it stays current - not by guesswork, but by science.
Seniors make up just 13.5% of the U.S. population but take 34% of all prescription drugs. About 23% of older adults living at home are on at least one medication flagged by the Beers Criteria. And it’s not just discomfort - it’s hospitalization. Studies show that inappropriate prescribing contributes to 15% of all hospital admissions among seniors.
When healthcare teams use the Beers Criteria properly, the results are dramatic. One study found a 28% drop in adverse drug events - like falls, confusion, or internal bleeding - after clinics started using the guidelines. In one clinic, benzodiazepine prescriptions for insomnia dropped by 43% in patients over 75 after EHR alerts were turned on.
But it’s not perfect. Some doctors complain about “alert fatigue.” If an electronic health record pops up 12 Beers Criteria warnings during a single visit, it’s easy to ignore them all. And sometimes, the criteria flag a drug that’s actually needed - like antipsychotics for severe dementia-related aggression. The guidelines don’t replace clinical judgment; they support it.
The 2025 update to the Beers Criteria includes something new: a list of alternatives. For every flagged drug, there’s now a recommendation for what to use instead.
These aren’t just guesses. They’re backed by clinical trials. The American Geriatrics Society now recommends non-drug options first - because they’re safer and often more effective long-term.
Pharmacists are the biggest fans. Nearly 9 out of 10 say the Beers Criteria helps them catch dangerous prescriptions during medication reviews. Geriatricians use it daily. But primary care doctors? Only 41% consistently apply it, according to CDC data.
Why the gap? Time. Training. Technology. Many clinics don’t have EHR alerts turned on. Others don’t have pharmacists on staff. And some doctors just don’t know the list well enough.
The good news? The American Geriatrics Society offers a free mobile app and pocket guide with quarterly updates. Over 87,000 people have downloaded it. Users report saving over 8 minutes per patient visit - time that can be spent talking to the patient instead of flipping through a manual.
There’s a dark side to the Beers Criteria that doesn’t get talked about enough. Many seniors can’t afford the safer alternatives. A study found that 25% of Medicare patients skip doses or don’t fill prescriptions because of cost. Sometimes, a cheaper but risky drug is the only option.
And globally, the problem is worse. In low-income countries, 63% of the medications on the Beers List have no affordable replacement. That’s why the World Health Organization calls the criteria “a luxury tool” in some settings - even if it’s the gold standard in the U.S.
The pharmaceutical industry is responding. Over 23 new “senior-friendly” drugs have been developed to replace Beers-listed ones. The market for these medications is expected to hit $84 billion by 2027. But until those drugs are covered by insurance and available everywhere, the Beers Criteria will always be just half the solution.
If you or a loved one is on multiple medications, ask these questions:
Don’t be afraid to ask your pharmacist to review all your meds - including over-the-counter ones. Many don’t realize that Benadryl, sleep aids, and antacids can be just as risky as prescription drugs.
And if your doctor says a flagged drug is necessary, ask why. Is it because nothing else works? Or because it’s easier to prescribe? The Beers Criteria isn’t a rulebook - it’s a conversation starter.
The 2026 update will expand kidney dosing guidance to cover every medication cleared by the kidneys. The American Geriatrics Society is also partnering with Google Health AI to build predictive tools that flag seniors at highest risk - before they even start a risky drug.
It’s not about eliminating medications. It’s about using them wisely. For older adults, the goal isn’t to take fewer pills - it’s to take the right ones. And with the Beers Criteria, we’re getting better at telling the difference.
The Beers Criteria is a list of medications that may be unsafe for adults aged 65 and older because the risks outweigh the benefits. Created by the American Geriatrics Society and updated every three years, it helps doctors and pharmacists avoid prescribing drugs that can cause confusion, falls, kidney damage, or dangerous interactions in older adults.
No, Benadryl (diphenhydramine) is flagged in the Beers Criteria as potentially inappropriate for seniors. It’s an anticholinergic drug that can cause drowsiness, confusion, memory problems, dry mouth, constipation, and even delirium. Even low doses can be risky, especially for those with dementia or kidney issues. Safer alternatives include melatonin or cognitive behavioral therapy for sleep.
NSAIDs like ibuprofen and naproxen increase the risk of stomach bleeding, kidney damage, and worsening heart failure in seniors. They also raise blood pressure and can interact dangerously with blood thinners. For arthritis pain, safer options include acetaminophen (within limits), topical creams, physical therapy, or low-dose corticosteroid injections.
Yes. As of 2024, Medicare Part D requires all prescription drug plans to use the Beers Criteria in medication therapy management programs for dual-eligible beneficiaries - people enrolled in both Medicare and Medicaid. This affects over 12 million Americans and ensures that high-risk medications are reviewed regularly.
Yes, but with caution. The Beers Criteria was designed for general use, not end-of-life care. In palliative settings, medications like antipsychotics or opioids may be needed to manage severe symptoms - even if they’re flagged as inappropriate. The goal shifts from avoiding risk to maximizing comfort. Clinicians should use the criteria as a guide, not a rule, and always consider individual patient goals.
Yes. The American Geriatrics Society offers a free mobile app and pocket guide with the full 2023 list and quarterly updates. The app is used by over 87,000 clinicians and saves an average of 8.2 minutes per patient visit. Many electronic health records, like Epic, also have built-in Beers Criteria alerts that flag risky prescriptions in real time.
The Beers Criteria is updated every three years by an expert panel that reviews hundreds of new studies. The most recent version was published in May 2023, with the next update expected in 2026. Updates add new medications to the list, remove those no longer considered risky, and expand guidance on kidney dosing and drug interactions.
Write a comment